If elderly tenants decide to move to a retirement home, they’ll correctly forego their rent. This became held in a judgment by the Rent Regulation Board on 26 March 2019 in Anna Maria Falzon, Josephine Borg, Raymond Borg, and Carmel Borg -v- Paul Sant, Felica Sant, and Miriam Sant.
In this case, the plaintiffs explained in their utility that they’re proprietors of assets in Marsa and that the tenants, Paul and Felica Sant, moved out to stay in a retirement home, so it’s no longer their house. Their daughter is occupying the premises. However, she no longer has an identity. The property is in want of urgent maintenance. The plaintiff asked the Board to formally reserve the defendants to vacate the premises.
The Sants responded to the software by mentioning that the utility was null because the utility no longer pointed out the expiry date of the hire. They denied that the property changed into abandoned and claimed that they might temporarily be in the retirement domestic. Magistrate Dr. Josette Demicoli, who presided over the proceedings, analyzed the evidence. The plaintiff, Anna Maria Falzon, testified that the belongings were, in fact, first rented to Felica Sant’s father, Carmelo Schembri.
When Felica married, her husband moved in. In June 2015, Paul and Felica Sant moved into a retirement home; therefore, the plaintiffs requested the keys to the premises. Miriam Sant commenced depositing the lease in court. The witness told the Board that she went to some instances to the belongings and did not locate everyone there. She also noticed that there had been damage to the house.
In reality, the property is overlying a complicated garage, and the tenants of the garages complained of leakages from the Sants’ residence. This version of activities became corroborated, employing the testimony from other plaintiffs. The plaintiff showed that in the electoral sign-in of April 2006, Miriam Sant became registered at the rented assets.
Miriam Sant testified and showed that she lives inside the said property independently since her parents went to stay in a retirement home. She confirmed that she works and earns a minimal wage, but there was a time when she had monetary difficulties after her separation. Magistrate Demicoli tested the first plea coping with the expiry date of the hire, which was no longer stated within the software.
However, the Board discussed this action by asking the Board to terminate the lease and not relocate the tenants. Therefore, the expiry date of the lease isn’t always required.
Regarding the deserves of the case, the Board talked about that there are principle issues. The first is whether or not the hire is terminated because Paul and Felica Sant are now in a retirement home and whether Miriam Sant has a right to occupy the assets in terms of Articles 1555A and 1531F of the Civil Code.
